Deception on LinkedIn®

Auteur:

Mic Adam
July 23, 2024

LinkedIn® wants to be known as a professional network where users can build their personal branding and networks, whether by sharing valuable content or not. However, like any other platform, LinkedIn® is not immune to deception and unfair practices. A growing problem is the use of automation tools and the purchase of engagement by some so-called ‘Top Voices’.

Collaborative articles are the way to become a ‘Top Voice’ (the gold badge) on LinkedIn®. As a Top Voice on LinkedIn®, you gain significant influence and have built a larger reach on the platform. These individuals are often seen as thought leaders in their field and enjoy great prestige.

However, not all Top Voices achieve their status honestly. Some people use improper practices to acquire this status. Here are some of their techniques:

  • Engagement pods: These are groups of users who collaborate with the goal of liking, sharing, and commenting on each other’s content. While this may seem like mutual support, it becomes problematic when the goal is purely to manipulate algorithms and create a false impression of popularity.
  • Automation tools: These tools can be used to automatically connect, send messages, and even perform interactions like likes and comments. This allows a user to quickly and artificially build a large network and high engagement without authentic interaction.
  • Buying likes and comments: There are services available that offer likes, comments, and shares for a fee. This naturally creates a false impression of influence and can mislead other users who think the person genuinely has a strong group of followers due to their valuable content.

The consequences of these deceptive practices are significant. First, they undermine the integrity of the platform. LinkedIn® is meant to promote genuine, authentic professional connections and exchanges of valuable ideas. When users are misled by artificially inflated profiles, it becomes harder to recognize truly valuable connections and content.

Second, the use of such practices can lead to a loss of trust within the community and in LinkedIn® itself. Users may become cynical and doubt the authenticity of engagement and the value of shared content. This can negatively impact the overall experience on LinkedIn®. LinkedIn® has policies and measures to counteract this kind of deception, such as detecting and punishing users who use automation tools or buy engagement. However, it remains an ongoing challenge to eliminate these practices as thought leaders become increasingly creative.

For users, it’s important to stay critical and aware of potential signs of deception. Authenticity and genuine interactions should always be at the core of professional networking. Only by staying true to these values can LinkedIn® continue its mission to be a reliable and valuable platform for professional growth and networking.

This blog is written in my own name.

Need help?

At Winger Academy, we’re not satisfied until you get results. We turn your LinkedIn® company page and profile into a golden business card and create LinkedIn® content that really scores.

Want to stay up to date on the latest LinkedIn® features?

🔥 Then subscribe to my monthly newsletter on LinkedIn®

🔥 Follow our Winger Academy company page

🔥 Follow me or connect with me and click the 🔔 in the upper right corner on my profile

🔥 Contact us if you want to know more about our trainings and services

Reading material or learning material? Food for thought!

Why LinkedIn® automation is not the answer!

Why LinkedIn® automation is not the answer!

Sounds familiar? Performing the same actions on LinkedIn® and other platforms daily. Soon, we think: "There must be more efficient ways to do this?" This often leads to searching for methods and tools to automate these actions. Over the years, many tools have been...

read more
Follow us on Social Media